Without a point-specific rubric for analysis I would think this to be a stunning success. It is a wonderful representation of the subject and carries a strong sense of volume in space. I see no signs of struggle with any material handling and your edges seem to be (even in spite of Mr. Speed’s vagueness in this regard) communicating the subject wonderfully.
Have you considered expanding the exercise in the future to include a greater range of edge variation? You may get more practice out of such an exercise if you push a subject/subjects into a scenario with a more shallow depth of field. You might also want to start thinking about edge “function” while you work. Most resources talk about edges in terms of rate (hard, soft) but seldom in terms of function. Give this article a look-see as I think it might help: