Politicized Art Schools Are Losing Students to the Atelier Movement By Michael Pearce

Politicized Art Schools Are Losing Students to the Atelier Movement

Published: James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
May 22, 2019 by Michael J. Pearce



"A series of disasters face art colleges and the art departments of American universities. Their campuses are closing, their freshmen numbers are dwindling, and their graduates are struggling. Getting more students into an art program is a hard sell.

To restore their appeal, art schools would do well to de-politicize their programs and focus on turning students into masters of their field who can then harness creativity for their art and their audience.

Art colleges struggle with the toxic perception that their graduates are qualified for nothing and have been bankrupted by their education. They take on tens of thousands of dollars in debt, only to be employed as burger-flippers clutching a worthless degree in their paint and grease-splattered hands. Their prospects are dismal: A 2018 Bankrate report noted that over 9 percent of them are unemployed, and fine art degrees ranked last of 162 different majors for their employment prospects—more than triple the average. Appallingly, with a 7.7 percent unemployment rate, high school dropouts are more likely to get a job than art majors. Of an estimated 2 million arts graduates, only 10 percent make a living as working artists…." - Michael J. Pearce

1 Like

Wow. Sobering statistics.

But I question a bit of the logic here though (I’ll admit I only skimmed the article, though :slight_smile:) . I smell a fallacy of some sort: “University art programs are bad as shown by these statistics. Therefore ateliers are good!”.

Are there better success statistics for atelier grads?

1 Like

You’re a man after my own heart Tim. LOL! Yes–Mr. Pearce is definitely NOT making a solid apples to apples comparison argument regarding the university vs. the atelier. In fact, in that regard, I’d say it is an extremely poor argument . Kudos to you for pointing it out.

I do however think that the article contains some links to some interesting data. Hopefully some good food for thought.